When Your Age May Change the Value of Routine Health Screenings

In this post I discuss the use, value, and the downside of health screening tests. Used wisely, they can potentially improve wellness and increase life span. But the benefit may not be as much as you might think, especially as you get older. Learn more in this post.

This information is current as of the date of original publication or update but may have changed by the time you read this. Do not use this information for diagnosis or treatment purposes. Before making health decisions, discuss with a qualified healthcare professional.

One way physicians help people stay healthy is by offering screening tests. These tests are intended to detect conditions that can be prevented or treated to increase life span, prevent disability, and promote wellness.

Screening tests are for people without symptoms of the condition in question. Recommendations for screening are usually based on patient-specific factors such as gender, age, family history, health habits, and other medical issues.

Screening tests that are recommended by medical organizations or governmental health agencies are usually covered by insurance without a copay.

Screening tests can be inconvenient and uncomfortable. They may create anxiety if further testing is needed to confirm results. These expenses may not be covered by insurance.

Most of the time, screening tests find no disease.

As we get older and remain healthy, it is reasonable to question whether screening tests are necessary or even helpful. Might it actually be harmful to screen older adults for conditions they likely never will develop, or if they do, will not cause premature death?

Doctors and patients are asking that question more often. This article from KFF Health News explores those questions.

3 Medical Routines That Older People May Not Need

By Paula Span, May 22, 2026

Enough time had passed since the patient’s previous colonoscopy that she met the criteria to undergo another, said Steven Itzkowitz, a gastroenterologist at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York.

She was in “reasonably good health,” and the risks of the procedure — bleeding, reaction to anesthesia, perforation of her colon — were fairly low. But she was 85. And she would need to briefly discontinue the blood thinners she took because of the cardiac stents keeping her arteries open; doing so could increase the risks.

Had Itzkowitz and his patient faced this decision five years ago, he might have scheduled the screening “without even thinking about it,” he said. But recent research has shown again that the benefits of a repeat colonoscopy are slim after age 75.

Now, he said, “I’m saying to myself, ‘What are we accomplishing here?’”

He’s not the only doctor — or patient — having second thoughts. The risks and benefits of common screenings, procedures, and drugs add up differently at advanced ages, and research continues to point out fresh examples of some that may become unnecessary.

Recently, investigators have taken on questions about common skin lesions that probably don’t need to be removed, a widely used thyroid medication that many older patients can safely discontinue, and colonoscopies that reduce colon cancer mortality so slightly that the risks may outweigh the benefits.

Ugly but Probably Harmless-Actinic Keratosis

The reddened or rough patches on the skin are called, in doctor-speak, actinic keratoses. Because they result from long-term sun exposure, they usually appear on faces, scalps, forearms, and the backs of hands.

Such lesions appear most commonly on older patients. One large study of traditional Medicare beneficiaries found that over a five-year period, almost 30% were diagnosed with an actinic keratosis. Then what?

Layers of the Skin diagram
The layers of the skin (epidermis and dermis), as well as an inset with a close-up view of the types of cells in the skin (squamous cells, basal cells, and melanocytes).
Source: National Cancer Institute
Creator: Don Bliss (Illustrator)
This image is in the public domain and can be freely reused. Please credit the source and, where possible, the creator listed above.

“The vast majority of the time, they’re removed,” said Allison Billi, a dermatologist at the University of Michigan and an author of a recent commentary on the topic in JAMA Internal Medicine. That typically involves cryosurgery (freezing with liquid nitrogen), topical creams, or laser therapy.

The rationale: The patches could become cancerous. But “for the average patient with no history of skin cancer, there is less than a 1-in-1,000 chance of it progressing to skin cancer,” Billi said, citing a 2013 meta-analysis. The lesions are far more likely to disappear on their own.

“The treatment may be more burdensome than the condition itself,” she added. Removal “is actually extremely painful, both during and after.” It can cause swelling, irritation, and lasting discoloration.

Besides, an actinic keratosis will probably reappear, or new ones will emerge. “This is a chronic condition,” Billi said.

She has proposed active surveillance, instead: Primary care doctors could observe the lesions annually for warning signs like bleeding, pain, or rapid growth, which might warrant removal. But “in many cases, it’s not necessary,” she said.

She does recommend using sunscreen, however. (affiliate)

“We don’t always need to do everything we can do.”

Dr. Allison Billi, dermatologist

Questionable Treatment-Hypothyroidism

Patients take levothyroxine, one of the world’s most frequently prescribed drugs, when their thyroid glands can’t produce sufficient thyroid hormone.

With this condition, called hypothyroidism, “people gain weight. They have less energy. Their hair and skin are dry,” explained Jacobijn Gussekloo, a primary care doctor and researcher at Leiden University Medical Center in the Netherlands. “Everything slows down.”

Doctors also increasingly prescribe it for a borderline condition called subclinical hypothyroidism, which usually causes no symptoms but can progress to hypothyroidism.

The thyroid gland, showing a tumor, original source NCI

Most patients take the drug for life — but do they have to? Gussekloo’s team has found that in many older adults with subclinical hypothyroidism, hormone levels normalize on their own.

The researchers have also reported that among older people with the condition, levothyroxine had no effect on symptoms and “no apparent benefit.”

Like any drug, it can also cause harm. It may interact with other medications that older patients typically take. Moreover, “it requires frequent lab tests and follow-ups, more visits and expense,” said Maria Papaleontiou, an endocrinologist at the University of Michigan and an author of an editorial in JAMA accompanying the latest Dutch study.

“In high doses, it can cause hyperthyroidism, which can lead to cardiac arrhythmias and bone loss,” she added. Patients taking it also have to adjust their diets and meal schedules.

To determine whether some patients could stop taking levothyroxine, the Dutch researchers devised a protocol that gradually reduced doses over 30 weeks, with ongoing lab testing and consultations with doctors.

After a year, a quarter of the 370 participants, all over 60, had discontinued the drug while maintaining healthy thyroid function. Most had been on lower doses to begin with.

Patients shouldn’t stop levothyroxine on their own, Papaleontiou cautioned. Discontinuation requires tapering off gradually, with testing and monitoring. Some patients will always need the drug.

But it appears that “a select group of adults over 60 may not require this treatment lifelong,” Papaleontiou said.

A Screening With Risks-Colonoscopy

The question of when older patients can safely stop screening for colon cancer has prompted years of debate. The influential U.S. Preventive Services Task Force gives the screening a lukewarm C rating after age 76, calling the benefit “small.”

Yet almost 60% of older patients who have had previous colonoscopies and face limited life expectancies (less than five years) are advised to undergo another screening, a 2023 study found.

diagram of the human digestive organs
The colon sits between the small intestine and the rectum, the green structure on this diagram. Stock image, source unknown

As a gastroenterologist at the University of California-San Diego, Samir Gupta regularly encounters this issue with older patients. “I know they really have a low risk of colon cancer, and I’m putting them through more risk,” he said.

The risk of complications following a colonoscopy rise with age. One study found that nearly 7% of patients over 75 had a hospitalization or emergency room visit within a month of the procedure.

Is it worth it? Gupta is the lead author of a new study of almost 92,000 Veterans Affairs patients over 75 who had previous colonoscopies. In about 28%, the procedure had found an adenoma, a type of polyp that can become cancerous. Though only a small fraction do, gastroenterologists generally remove them.

The researchers found that after 10 years, veterans with a previous adenoma were more likely to develop colon cancer than those without one, though the rate was extremely low in both groups.

But just 0.5% — yes, one-half of 1% — of those with a previous adenoma died of colon cancer, compared with 0.4% of those without one. “A tiny difference,” Gupta said.

Both groups were dwarfed by the number of veterans — almost half — who died within the decade of other causes.

“Even if the procedure goes well, you’ll either find nothing or you’ll find something that’s not going to have real impact on your longevity,” said Itzkowitz, an author of an editorial published alongside the study.

Yet he has found that many patients who have had polyps removed want to continue colonoscopies.

It is hard to shift established medical norms. Efforts to “deprescribe” drugs can meet with opposition from both patients and health care professionals.

Many older women continue having mammograms past the point of documented benefit, and older men often undergo prostate cancer screening beyond the recommended age.

chance of developing breast cancer by age 70-National Cancer Institute
Source: National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Colonoscopies are less pleasant, so perhaps older patients will be glad to forgo them. “Even with polyps, the chance of dying from colon cancer is so low compared to everything else that can get you,” Itzkowitz said.

So he told his 85-year-old patient that she could skip another colonoscopy. She seemed pleased.

The New Old Age is produced through a partnership with The New York Times.

KFF Health News is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF—an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF.

This article first appeared on KFF Health News and is republished here under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Images in this Post

The graphics were not in the original KFF article. The cover image was generated by AI in WordPress.

Exploring your health

Screening medical tests are not just for older people. Screening evaluations are recommended for people of all ages. all ages.

Do you know what screening tests are recommended for you? You can consult an online resource, but the best source is your own personal physician, who knows your past, current, and family medical history.

What does or would motivate you to have screening tests, or not?

What benefit, or not, have you received from screening tests you have done?

Exploring the HEART of Health

I’d love for you to follow this blog and follow me on social media.

I share information and inspiration to help you transform challenges into opportunities for learning and growth.

Add your name to the subscribe box to be notified of new posts by email. Click the link to read the post and browse other content. It’s that simple. No spam.

I enjoy seeing who is new to Watercress Words. When you subscribe, I will visit your blog or website. Thanks and see you next time.

Dr. Aletha

Screening medical tests- desirable or distracting?

Screening tests can help identify diseases early but pose challenges for both doctors and patients. Physicians often struggle with balancing test explanations and patient care, while patients face costs and inconvenience. The effectiveness of screening depends on its accuracy, patient benefit, and alignment with individual health goals.

This post has been updated July 2025

Both doctors and patients have mixed emotions about tests done to screen for disease. We, as physicians, want to help patients stay healthy, prevent disease, and treat problems early and effectively.

However, the time spent explaining, ordering, performing, and reviewing these tests means less time available to manage patients’ existing medical problems.

I agree with Dr. William Zinn, a family physician in Boston, who wrote

“Keeping track of the ever-increasing health maintenance requirements and cancer screening sometimes make it hard to remember why the patient came to the office in the first place.”

JAMA, January 7, 2020

For patients the issues are similar. While they want to stay healthy, prevent disease, and get treated promptly, they don’t like the inconvenience, time away from work, cost, and sometimes discomfort the tests require.

What are screening tests?

A screening medical test is done to uncover a disease or disorder in a person who may or may not be at risk for it and who otherwise feels well and has a normal exam. Suppose we are considering screening a group of people for disease X. Let’s start by dividing them into 3 groups.

  • Those with no symptoms, feel fine, at average risk of health condition X.
  • Those with no symptoms, feel fine, at increased or high risk of condition X.
  • Those who have symptoms suggestive of condition X, or have had other testing that suggests they might have it

Screening for X in groups 1 and 2 might be appropriate, based on medical guidelines, physician judgement, and patient preference. For group 3, with symptoms of condition X, testing would be considered diagnostic; a doctor would test for X, and possibly other conditions that the symptoms suggest.

Diagnostic vs Screening

That might seem like a picky difference, but there are several implications for both doctors and patients.

Documentation- The medical record must document accurately the reason a test is being ordered and done. This is necessary for billing because inaccurate coding can make doctors and clinics liable for fraud. Also, the government and other payers are starting to judge doctors’ quality of care based on medical record audits of care given or not given, and why.

Interpretation and Follow-up-A test is rarely interpreted in isolation. The history and exam together with the test determine if further testing or treatment is needed.

Reimbursement– Most if not all insurances, including Medicare, reimburse differently based on whether a test is diagnostic or screening. And this usually determines how much the patient pays for each. Screening tests are usually covered 100% while diagnostic testing may require a deductible or copay .

A Country Doctor Writes blog explains this dilemma in detail –

But because in the inscrutable wisdom of the Obama Affordable Care Act, it was decided that screening colonoscopies done on people with no symptoms whatsoever are a freebie, whereas colonoscopies done when patients have symptoms of colon cancer are subject to severe financial penalties.

HANS DUVEFELT, MD

This link at FamilyDoctor.org helps explain

Health Insurance: Understanding What It Covers

Cervical cancer screening frequency also now takes into account a woman’s HPV, human papilloma virus, status. Go here to learn

When should a woman begin cervical cancer screening, and how often should she be screened?

a microscope image of a cell infected with HPV

A koilocyte is a squamous epithelial cell that has undergone structural changes as a result of infection by human papillomavirus (HPV). This image of a koilocyte shows human ectocervical cells (HEC) expressing HPV-16 E5 oncoprotein, and immortalized with HPV-16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins. Formation of koilocytes requires cooperation between HPV E5 and E6 oncoproteins. The cell culture is stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E).National Cancer Institute \ Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ewa Krawczyk, public domain

Does disease screening make a difference?

Screening tests don’t prevent disease although they may be helpful for health maintenance or improvement. They may prevent progression or complications of a disease, but don’t prevent its onset.

They may not prevent death from the disease, although we like to believe they do. Screening may diagnose the disease before symptoms develop, so the patient lives longer with the disease, but not affect the eventual outcome.

Colon cancer is occurring at younger ages so the age to begin screening is now under age 50. Doctors can offer patients an option that is more accurate than the stool blood test and less invasive than colonoscopy.

Stool DNA testing looks for certain DNA or gene changes in cells that can get into the stool from polyps (pre-cancerous growths) or cancer cells.  It may also check for blood in the stool.

For this test, people use an at-home kit to collect a stool sample and mail it to a lab. Cologuard® is the name of the stool DNA test that is currently FDA-approved. This stool test needs to be done every 3 years.

When should we offer screening tests?

If there is a clear benefit to patients from an effective treatment available to make a difference in the disease course or

If knowledge of the condition helps the patient and family make choices about managing the condition’s likely course or the need for family members to be screened

If the test is reliable enough to identify most people with the disease without falsely identifying people who don’t have it. The scientific terms for this are sensitivity and specificity.

When the benefits clearly outweigh the risks and costs.

a mammogram image
a mammogram revealing a breast cancer image source- National Library of Medicine, Open-i

How to decide on screening for yourself

These are just some of the factors involved in deciding when to undergo screening tests. To make an intelligent decision about your own screening, you need a physician who reviews your past and current medical history, your family history, and your health goals.

Then the doctor can make recommendations based on your needs and desires with the help of expert guidelines published by medical organizations that carefully review the medical literature.

Help your doctor help you by scheduling a health maintenance visit rather than bringing it up when you are there sick or for chronic care. These discussions deserve your physician’s full attention.

from the National Institutes of Health.

To Screen or Not to Screen

¿Hacer o no hacer pruebas de detección?

Exploring the HEART of health maintenance

I’d love for you to follow this blog and follow me on social media.

I share information and inspiration to help you transform challenges into opportunities for learning and growth.

Add your name to the subscribe box to be notified of new posts by email. Click the link to read the post and browse other content. It’s that simple. No spam.

I enjoy seeing who is new to Watercress Words. When you subscribe, I will visit your blog or website. Thanks and see you next time.

Dr. Aletha

RoboForm Password Manager. What I use to manage passwords.

Go to this link to try RoboForm Free;

if you like it you can upgrade to RoboForm Everywhere version with all the features

With Roboform, you will have one less thing to feel stressed about. (affiliate link)